Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Discussion about the 15th Judicial Circuit, including the clerks office, the courthouse and other county offices
Public Enimies

Re: Victim Services, and Legal Aid Criminal Frauds

Postby Public Enimies » Sun May 22, 2016 1:08 pm

Although not advertised,
The Following, is the Primary Function , of Palm Beach Legal Aid, and Palm Beach County Victim Services.

117.105 False or fraudulent acknowledgments; penalty.—A notary public who falsely or fraudulently takes an acknowledgment of an instrument as a notary public or who falsely or fraudulently makes a certificate as a notary public or who falsely takes or receives an acknowledgment of the signature on a written instrument is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 6, ch. 91-291.



118.10 Civil-law notary.—
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Authentic act” means an instrument executed by a civil-law notary referencing this section, which instrument includes the particulars and capacities to act of any transacting parties, a confirmation of the full text of any necessary instrument, the signatures or their legal equivalent of any transacting parties, the signature and seal of a civil-law notary, and such other information prescribed by the Secretary of State.
(b) “Civil-law notary” means a person who is a member in good standing of The Florida Bar,


837.011 Definitions.—In this chapter, unless a different meaning plainly is required:

(1) “Official proceeding” means a proceeding heard, or which may be or is required to be heard, before any legislative, judicial, administrative, or other governmental agency or official authorized to take evidence under oath, including any referee, general or special magistrate, administrative law judge, hearing officer, hearing examiner, commissioner, notary, or other person taking testimony or a deposition in connection with any such proceeding.

(3) “Material matter” means any subject, regardless of its admissibility under the rules of evidence, which could affect the course or outcome of the proceeding.
Whether a matter is material in a given factual situation is a question of law.
History.—s. 53, ch. 74-383; s. 316, ch. 96-410; s. 1823, ch. 97-102; s. 98, ch. 2004-11.


837.012 Perjury when not in an official proceeding.—

(1) Whoever makes a false statement, which he or she does not believe to be true, under oath, not in an official proceeding, in regard to any material matter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(2) Knowledge of the materiality of the statement is not an element of this crime, and the defendant’s mistaken belief that his or her statement was not material is not a defense.
History.—s. 2, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2560; GS 3472; RGS 5341; CGL 7474; s. 997, ch. 71-136; s. 54, ch. 74-383; s. 32, ch. 75-298; s. 205, ch. 91-224; s. 1310, ch. 97-102.
Note.—Former s. 837.01.


837.05 False reports to law enforcement authorities.—

(1)(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) or subsection (2), a person who knowingly gives false information to a law enforcement officer concerning the alleged commission of any crime, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(b) A person who commits a violation of paragraph (a) commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084, if the person has previously been convicted of a violation of paragraph (a) and subparagraph 1. or subparagraph 2. applies:

1. The information the person gave to the law enforcement officer was communicated orally and the officer’s account of that information is corroborated by:

a. An audio recording or audio recording in a video of that information;
b. A written or recorded statement made by the person who gave that information; or
c. Another person who was present when that person gave that information to the officer and heard that information.
2. The information the person gave to the law enforcement officer was communicated in writing.

837.06 False official statements.—Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his or her official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
History.—s. 58, ch. 74-383; s. 34, ch. 75-298; s. 207, ch. 91-224; s. 1313, ch. 97-102.

198.38 False return; penalty.—Any person who willfully aids or assists in, or procures, counsels, or advises, the preparation or presentation under, or in connection with any matter arising under, this chapter of a false or fraudulent return, affidavit, claim, or document shall (whether or not such falsity or fraud is with the knowledge or consent of the person authorized or required to present such return, affidavit, claim or document) be guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
History.—s. 27, ch. 16015, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 7473(3-a); s. 98, ch. 71-136.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Sun May 22, 2016 1:31 pm

You are a whiny little cutie. Get a life.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Sun May 22, 2016 1:32 pm

You are a whiny little cutie. Get a life.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Sun May 22, 2016 1:32 pm

Barracuda. Guess the word has been banned.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Sun May 22, 2016 2:28 pm

What is the point of all of this? First you rail against Civil Deputies who serve papers and they are simply handing you a piece of paper. They are not swearing to anything other than they handed it to you. They are not party to the proceedings and all this garbage is pointless.
0 x

777.03

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby 777.03 » Sun May 22, 2016 3:57 pm

Guest wrote:What is the point of all of this? First you rail against Civil Deputies who serve papers and they are simply handing you a piece of paper. They are not swearing to anything other than they handed it to you. They are not party to the proceedings and all this garbage is pointless.


"they are simply handing you a piece of paper"

777.03 Accessory after the fact.—

(1)(a) Any person not standing in the relation of husband or wife, parent or grandparent, child or grandchild, brother or sister, by consanguinity or affinity to the offender, who maintains or assists the principal or an accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed a crime and such crime was a third degree felony, or had been an accessory thereto before the fact, with the intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

(b) Any person who maintains or assists the principal or accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed the offense of child abuse, neglect of a child, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child under 18 years of age, or murder of a child under 18 years of age, or had been an accessory thereto before the fact, with the intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, is an accessory after the fact unless the court finds that the person is a victim of domestic violence.

(c) Any person who maintains or assists the principal or an accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed a crime and such crime was a capital, life, first degree, or second degree felony, or had been an accessory thereto before the fact, with the intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

(2)(a) If the felony offense committed is a capital felony, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(b) If the felony offense committed is a life felony or a felony of the first degree, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c) If the felony offense committed is a felony of the second degree or a felony of the third degree ranked in level 3, 4,

5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023, the offense of accessory after the fact is a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(d) If the felony offense committed is a felony of the third degree ranked in level 1 or level 2 under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023, the offense of accessory after the fact is a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(3) Except as otherwise provided in s. 921.0022, for purposes of sentencing under chapter 921 and determining incentive gain-time eligibility under chapter 944, the offense of accessory after the fact is ranked two levels below the ranking under s. 921.0022 or s. 921.0023 of the felony offense committed.
History.—s. 6, sub-ch. 11, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2356; GS 3180; RGS 5010; CGL 7112; s. 700, ch. 71-136; s. 65, ch. 74-383; s. 13, ch. 95-184; s. 16, ch. 97-194; s. 15, ch. 99-168; s. 2, ch. 2006-237.
Note.—Former s. 776.03.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Sun May 22, 2016 7:02 pm

You are a tool. They aren't doing anything "After the fact" because they don't investigate subpoenas. They just pick them up and drop them off. Nothing more. There are hundreds of thousands of subpoenas served every year in this county compelling people to go to court or hearings. They have nothing to do with the men and women who serve them.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Sun May 22, 2016 7:47 pm

Guest wrote:You are a tool. They aren't doing anything "After the fact" because they don't investigate subpoenas. They just pick them up and drop them off. Nothing more. There are hundreds of thousands of subpoenas served every year in this county compelling people to go to court or hearings. They have nothing to do with the men and women who serve them.


The server came with another detective, the first time around, as this lady made other accusations.
Problem was, this lady could not figure out . "who. what. where, when, and the detective became discussed with her, and dropped that case, but then the 2nd, keeps coming back for serves, after seeing, and being given evidence, that the serves are in fact, fraudulent. They are LEO's, even though its a civil serve. Crimes were commuted, and it's in plain view. baked by legally sufficient evidence. "known to the DS.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Sun May 22, 2016 8:43 pm

Subpoena served for purposes of investigation? Because you're making no sense at all. If you are being investigated for a crime and you are served a subpoena compelling you to do or provide something and you are the target of that investigation then you should confess because by compelling you they are providing you with immunity. A violation of the 5th Amendment if they intend to arrest you. If they say you are not the suspect and you do t want to comply, go see the Judge.
0 x

Lt. Cuntplex

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Lt. Cuntplex » Sun May 22, 2016 9:09 pm

Guest wrote:Subpoena served for purposes of investigation? Because you're making no sense at all. If you are being investigated for a crime and you are served a subpoena compelling you to do or provide something and you are the target of that investigation then you should confess because by compelling you they are providing you with immunity. A violation of the 5th Amendment if they intend to arrest you. If they say you are not the suspect and you do t want to comply, go see the Judge.



After the initial criminal investigation, I was cleared, But in tandem, the civil serve still held, although the accusations were as frivolous and malicious, as the criminal claims, and were "unsupported", with the same evidence.

The courts and taxpayers, can save a lot of money, by indicating to victim services, that the courts are not to be used for attacking Innocent persons, using visibly purged, counterfeited, and doctored documents.

Further, making monkeys, of DS's, is what occurs, aside from incorporating LE as useful idiots, to use for personal vendettas.
Not to mention the harmed citizen.

Let Lt. Hannon be known for his fearful, and disdainful, and lazy crew, that he leads. Cowards, come in all sizes, ranks and shapes.

This thread is in part, my thanks to him, for being "UN"-accountable, and a coward, for not holding victim services, responsible, for supporting a known fraud, and pretend victim. More to come, enjoy.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Sun May 22, 2016 10:47 pm

Re FS 837. and 777.03 "Criminal Offenses"
Horton v. California 496 U.S. 128 (1990), the court eliminated the requirement that the discovery of evidence in plain view be inadvertent, a requirement that had led to difficulties in defining "inadvertent discovery."
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Sun May 22, 2016 10:52 pm

A DS, is a DS, even during a civil serve.

Exculpatory evidence comes in a number of different forms. It may be testimony from a witness who states that she saw someone other than the defendant commit the crime or that the defendant was with the witness when the crime occurred. It may be real evidence or an object from the crime scene, such as fingerprints lifted from a weapon that don’t match the defendant’s fingerprints. It may be security video footage that shows whoever committed the crime doesn’t match the description of the defendant. Exculpatory evidence may be real or documentary, direct evidence or circumstantial evidence, testimony or a physical exhibit presented in court. If it tends to show the defendant might not be guilty of the crime, it is “exculpatory.”

In Brady v. Maryland, the U.S. Supreme Court held that if a prosecutor has access to exculpatory evidence, he is required to share that evidence with the defense
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Mon May 23, 2016 7:41 pm

Much like the Seth Adams case, when the criminal case is put to rest, the Civil aspects can continue with a much lower threshold of guilt/culpability. Doesn't change the facts that a Deputy handing you a piece of paper is not actively investigating the complaint with very few exceptions. I know they so some mental health and DV stuff but they don't drive the investigations. That is typically done before they ever get it. I wish you luck with whatever your issue is. However, it's not on the guy or gal handing you paper.
0 x

Neglect to Prevent

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Neglect to Prevent » Mon May 23, 2016 8:20 pm

Guest wrote:Much like the Seth Adams case, when the criminal case is put to rest, the Civil aspects can continue with a much lower threshold of guilt/culpability. Doesn't change the facts that a Deputy handing you a piece of paper is not actively investigating the complaint with very few exceptions. I know they so some mental health and DV stuff but they don't drive the investigations. That is typically done before they ever get it. I wish you luck with whatever your issue is. However, it's not on the guy or gal handing you paper.


You're right. The paper handler knows, we're pit up against each other. And shuts down, as if to say, my boss is not going to want to hear , that the serve is a felony in progress. Yet, the language of FS's indicates the serve itself, is in fact, a crime.

My claims are not debating weather I'm being treated any different, than other serve/.
My claim is the the "letter of law", dictates that an LE, coming across a felony "in progress, is mandated to act.

The way a particular county does something, i.e., perfunctory, and localized processes, should not abridge Federally protected rights, nor is it a legal excuse, to neglect to prevent harm, when evidence is in plain view.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Tue May 24, 2016 8:17 am

:geek: in order to commit a felony, one must have intent. The intent is to hand you a piece of paper. Not deny you liberty or your right to due process. It is a notice, something that is required so that you know what is going on. Your issue is with whoever your court adversary is with and not the person providing you with that notice.
0 x

Neglect to Prevent

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Neglect to Prevent » Wed May 25, 2016 12:38 pm

Guest wrote::geek: in order to commit a felony, one must have intent. The intent is to hand you a piece of paper. Not deny you liberty or your right to due process. It is a notice, something that is required so that you know what is going on. Your issue is with whoever your court adversary is with and not the person providing you with that notice.


The paperwork served, was inconsistent, with the purpose of the serve.
The ill-gotten, service, was based on an official letterhead, from a police dept., without police involvement.

The actual police form, was taken from a LEO months in advance, and then drawn up, by a civilian.
That form, (counterfeited), was then presented to a deputy clerk, (as a qualifier), for the judge to allow the serve.

The official police form, that was (counterfeited), was brought to the attention of the DS doing the serve, as hard copy evidence was presented, establishing a fraud, with the severs own eyes, ( plain view).
0 x

Perjury is a crime

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Perjury is a crime » Wed May 25, 2016 2:52 pm

Neglect to Prevent wrote:
Guest wrote::geek: in order to commit a felony, one must have intent. The intent is to hand you a piece of paper. Not deny you liberty or your right to due process. It is a notice, something that is required so that you know what is going on. Your issue is with whoever your court adversary is with and not the person providing you with that notice.


The paperwork served, was inconsistent, with the purpose of the serve.
The ill-gotten, service, was based on an official letterhead, from a police dept., without police involvement.

The actual police form, was taken from a LEO months in advance, and then drawn up, by a civilian.
That form, (counterfeited), was then presented to a deputy clerk, (as a qualifier), for the judge to allow the serve.

The official police form, that was (counterfeited), was brought to the attention of the DS doing the serve, as hard copy evidence was presented, establishing a fraud, with the severs own eyes, ( plain view).


837.02 Perjury in official proceedings.—
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2), whoever makes a false statement, which he or she does not believe to be true, under oath in an official proceeding in regard to any material matter, commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(2) Whoever makes a false statement, which he or she does not believe to be true, under oath in an official proceeding that relates to the prosecution of a capital felony, commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(3) Knowledge of the materiality of the statement is not an element of the crime of perjury under subsection (1) or subsection (2), and the defendant’s mistaken belief that the statement was not material is not a defense.
History.—s. 1, sub-ch. 6, ch. 1637, 1868; RS 2561; GS 3473; RGS 5343; CGL 7477; s. 998, ch. 71-136; s. 55, ch. 74-383; s. 33, ch. 75-298; s. 3, ch. 97-90; s. 1311, ch. 97-102.
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Wed May 25, 2016 6:10 pm

What "statement" would the Deputy serving you papers be able to give? That they handed you papers?
0 x

blacks Law

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby blacks Law » Wed May 25, 2016 6:32 pm

Guest wrote:What "statement" would the Deputy serving you papers be able to give? That they handed you papers?


That the document he handed me, which was in part supported as a qualifier, for the serve, contained official letterhead, of a Police Dept., and was accepted by a Dep. Clerk, as an official form, authored and produced by a sworn LEO, when it fact, it was counterfeited.

Civilians, who obtain and official "blank form", under false pretenses, and then go on to not only write out a complaint, but then, fence it off on a Dep. Clerk, where it was accepted as such, is a crime.
And, the LEO, is a LEO.

The server took note of the counterfeited form, acknowledged the redacts and tampered portion, and was sent information supporting the claim, and I have yet to receive a complaint #.

The official PD "form", was used without permission, to gain a 12.980t "form, (New), that set off a chain reaction, as the counterfeited legal "form, was used out of sequence, as per internal directives, and law.
http://thelawdictionary.org/form/
0 x

Guest

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Guest » Thu May 26, 2016 7:16 am

Without knowing what kind of case you are talking about, no letterhead from an agency would be involved. It's either Criminal (requiring a PC Affidavit) or Civil which would be an affidavit to the courts. Either way it emanates from the courts and should be addressed in a court.
0 x

Theft Fraud

Re: Victim Services, Training Classes, for Federal Funding

Postby Theft Fraud » Thu May 26, 2016 11:48 am

Guest wrote:Without knowing what kind of case you are talking about, no letterhead from an agency would be involved. It's either Criminal (requiring a PC Affidavit) or Civil which would be an affidavit to the courts. Either way it emanates from the courts and should be addressed in a court.


You're correct. The usage of the 12.980t form, is a civil. It requires repeat. The petitioner called the police, (male) officer, and he blew it off, as the business owner, refused to return his calls.
This business owner then , covertly called a "female officer, a few days later, The petitioner refused to provide a written narrative to both officer 1, and 2.

Instead of providing a written statement to the 2nd, officer, the petitioner kept the "blank PD letterhead, filled it on her own, and pawned in it off on a Dep. Clerk, as if it was generated by a LEO.
The "form" was explicitly accepted as a police report, as generated by a LE agency, "in writing.

This strategy was used to give the appearance of a repeat incident, which is a prerequisite of the petitioner, in order to gain a 12.980t form, in a civil.

The Petitioner, stole close to 10,000.00, and used the SO's, to help to do so, under the guise of being a victim. In short, the newly released 12.980t form. is being used by Victim Services, "knowingly", under false pretenses, and knowingly, furthering theft/fraud.
0 x

Bishops Boys

The Honorable Jeffrey Colbath and Victim Services

Postby Bishops Boys » Thu May 26, 2016 12:24 pm

Example:

Suppose I called the police, and then they failed to follow through, or did something bad.

If I, were to send an email, claiming to that agency, that I would go to FDLE, if not corrected, that is now a threat, and considered harassment, according to the 12,980t, and the corrupt "family court judge hearing the case.

Or, suppose I bought a couch from a furniture store, paid for it, but never got a delivery.
If I were to send an email, advising that I will be going to the BBB, that is now under 12,980t.
And its not a threat per se, "but", if the thief says they "feel" threatened, anfd therefore, Victim Services is used to interfere in the "business relationship dispute, and side with the thief, using the 12.980t form as a guise, to shift the case from civil into the family division, and thereby enabling the thief, to fabricate falsehoods, as a "female", in a family court.

Thanks to the The Honorable Jeffrey Colbath, Victim Services, is now able to interfere with business contracts, and forever ruin reputations, and enable theft, under the guise of protection.

This is what Lt. Hannan's staff at court services both support, and , "enforces", "knowingly....

Ms Bishop, the Director of Victim Services, uses Hannan's officers, as useful idiots......
Hannan knows it, and does nothing.
0 x


Return to “P.B.C. 15th Judicial - Clerk, Courts, Etc...”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron